I keep going back-and-forth on whether or not collectd should run in a
container on Fedora CoreOS machines. On the one hand, running it
directly on the host allows it to monitor filesystem usage by mount
point, which is consistent with how non-FCOS machines are monitored.
On the other hand, installing packages on FCOS with `rpm-ostree` is a
nightmare. It's _incredibly_ slow. There's also occasionally issues
installing packages if the base layer has not been updated in a while
and the new packages require an existing package to be updated.
For the NUT server specifically, I have changed my mind again: the
*collectd-nut* package depends on *nut-client*, which in turn depends on
Python. I definitely want to avoid installing Python on the host, but I
do not want to lose the ability to monitor the UPSs via collectd. Using
a container, I can strip out the unnecessary bits of *nut-client* and
avoid installing Python at all. I think that's worth having to monitor
filesystem usage by device instead of by mount point.
A bunch of stuff that wasn't schema definitions ended up in the `schema`
package. Rather than split values up in a bunch of top-level packages,
I think it would be better to have a package-per-app model.
Although KCL is unquestionably a more powerful language, and maps more
closely to my mental model of how host/environment/application
configuration is defined, the fact that it doesn't work on ARM (issue
982]) makes it a non-starter. It's also quite slow (owing to how it
compiles a program to evaluate the code) and cumbersome to distribute.
Fortunately, `tmpl` doesn't care how the values it uses were computed,
so we freely change configuration languages, so long as whatever we use
generates JSON/YAML.
CUE is probably a lot more popular than KCL, and is quite a bit simpler.
It's more restrictive (values cannot be overridden once defined), but
still expressive enough for what I am trying to do (so far).
Dustin