The `fetchcert` tool is a short shell script that fetches an X.509
certificate and corresponding private key from a Kubernetes Secret,
using the Kubernetes API. I originally wrote it for the Frigate server
so it could fetch the _pyrocufflink.blue_ wildcard certificate, which is
managed by _cert-manager_. Since then, I have adapted it to be more
generic, so it will be useful to fetch the _loki.pyrocufflink.blue_
certificate for Grafana Loki.
Although the script is rather simple, it does have several required
configuration parameters. It needs to know the URL of the Kubernetes
API server and have the certificate for the CA that signs the server
certificate, as well as an authorization token. It also needs to know
the namespace and name of the Secret from which it will fetch the
certificate and private key. Finally, needs to know the paths to the
files where the fetched data will be written.
Generally, after certificates are updated, some action needs to be
performed in order to make use of them. This typically involves
restarting or reloading a daemon. Since the `fetchcert` tool runs in
a container, it can't directly perform those actions, so it simply
indicates via a special exit code that the certificate has been updated
and some further action may be needed. The
`/etc/fetchcert/postupdate.sh` script is executed by _systemd_ after
`fetchcert` finishes. If the `EXIT_STATUS` environment variable (which
is set by _systemd_ to the return code of the main service process)
matches the expected code, the configured post-update actions will be
executed.
I do not like how Fedora CoreOS configures `sudo` to allow the *core*
user to run privileged processes without authentication. Rather than
assign the user a password, which would then have to be stored
somewhere, we'll install *pam_ssh_agent_auth* and configure `sudo` to
use it for authentication. This way, only users with the private key
corresponding to one of the configured public keys can run `sudo`.
Naturally, *pam_ssh_agent_auth* has to be installed on the host system.
We achieve this by executing `rpm-ostree` via `nsenter` to escape the
container. Once it is installed, we configure the PAM stack for
`sudo` to use it and populate the authorized keys database. We also
need to configure `sudo` to keep the `SSH_AUTH_SOCK` environment
variable, so *pam_ssh_agent_auth* knows where to look for the private
keys. Finally, we disable the default NOPASSWD rule for `sudo`, if
and only if the new configuration was installed.
`upsmon` is the component of NUT that tracks the status of UPSs and
reacts to their changing by sending notifications and/or shutting down
the system. It is a networked application that can run on any system;
it can run on a different system than `upsd`, and indeed can run on
multiple systems simultaneously.
Each system that runs `upsmon` will need a username and password for
each UPS it will monitor. Using the CUE [function pattern][0], I've
made it pretty simple to declare the necessary values under
`nut.monitor`.
[0]: https://cuetorials.com/patterns/functions/
I keep going back-and-forth on whether or not collectd should run in a
container on Fedora CoreOS machines. On the one hand, running it
directly on the host allows it to monitor filesystem usage by mount
point, which is consistent with how non-FCOS machines are monitored.
On the other hand, installing packages on FCOS with `rpm-ostree` is a
nightmare. It's _incredibly_ slow. There's also occasionally issues
installing packages if the base layer has not been updated in a while
and the new packages require an existing package to be updated.
For the NUT server specifically, I have changed my mind again: the
*collectd-nut* package depends on *nut-client*, which in turn depends on
Python. I definitely want to avoid installing Python on the host, but I
do not want to lose the ability to monitor the UPSs via collectd. Using
a container, I can strip out the unnecessary bits of *nut-client* and
avoid installing Python at all. I think that's worth having to monitor
filesystem usage by device instead of by mount point.
A bunch of stuff that wasn't schema definitions ended up in the `schema`
package. Rather than split values up in a bunch of top-level packages,
I think it would be better to have a package-per-app model.
Although KCL is unquestionably a more powerful language, and maps more
closely to my mental model of how host/environment/application
configuration is defined, the fact that it doesn't work on ARM (issue
982]) makes it a non-starter. It's also quite slow (owing to how it
compiles a program to evaluate the code) and cumbersome to distribute.
Fortunately, `tmpl` doesn't care how the values it uses were computed,
so we freely change configuration languages, so long as whatever we use
generates JSON/YAML.
CUE is probably a lot more popular than KCL, and is quite a bit simpler.
It's more restrictive (values cannot be overridden once defined), but
still expressive enough for what I am trying to do (so far).
Dustin